I've been thinking about the power of the word "accuracy" when applied to fiction. The word is most often applied to historical fiction, which is important in many respects, but does that mean we should not question aspects of these stories that are deemed "accurate"? I am talking about a very specific scenario here, being Regency and Victorian romance novels. Let me explain... Regency and Victorian England are two popular time periods that many contemporary historical romance novels are set in, no doubt because of the continued love for Jane Austen over the centuries. From the Bridgerton craze, to stories of capturing dukes and seducing lords, these stories often romanticize the period by reproducing beloved romance tropes - not that I am complaining. These stories can often be imaginative and empowering for many characters that would not have had a voice in reality, and I cannot deny that they are entertaining. And yet, under the guise of "accuracy,...
One of the biggest regrets I had during 2021 was that I let my blog slip through the cracks...which is a pity, because I like to blog. Therefore, I have decided to write once more (hopefully more than once), because I want to talk about Kamila Knows Best by Farah Heron. You may recognize Heron's name from her previous works: The Chai Factor and Accidentally Engaged. Both of these novels were well written, humorous, and heartwarming, but I loved them all the more because they are set in Canada and written by a Canadian. Kamila Knows Best stays true to all of these points. Set in Toronto, this adaptation of Jane Austen's Emma was faithful to the original while adding twists and turns that are accurate for a modern retelling. Kamila is an accountant who loves her father, friends, dog and career deeply, but all of these things means she is too busy for a serious relationship -- or so she claims. Kamila also fancies herself a matchmaker, and takes pride in the fact th...